Augusto Backes: Mestres do Bitcoin realmente funciona?

We need to produce content according to strict rules. We must output HTML tags only:

,

,

,
• , ,
  ,,

  ,

  , . No markdown, no headings except . Also must start with a of contextualization. Then we need to include a section with “PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS DE TRIAGEM CLÍNICA (TOPO DO FUNIL)” containing 7-10 questions in format? Wait, we cannot use . The directive says generate questions in format . But earlier rule 1 says write exclusively using tags HTML clean: , , , , , ,, , , . So we cannot use . Conflict. However the directive says “Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas e quebre a monotonia das respostas aplicando os formatos estruturados solicitados”. It also says earlier “Regra V40 de Cadência Visual” includes options but not heading tags. The only heading allowed is . So maybe we need to use for each question? Or we can embed questions as headings? The instruction: “Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas em formato simulando “Sintomas””. But rule 1 says only . Conflict. We must prioritize the higher-level instruction? The system says we must obey all rules. There’s conflict between user-provided directive and rule 1. Which to prioritize? The “Regra 1” says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , , , , ,, , , . Não use Markdown (*, **, #) e nunca use a tag .” So we cannot use . So we must use for headings. Probably we can use for each question. The user asked to generate in format , but we must obey rule 1, which is part of the system constraints. So we will use for each question. We need to produce the editorial part 1 of diagnosis focusing on triagem de dificuldades and prescrição de atalhos. Must start with a contextualizing. Then we need to include the dynamic content: 7-10 questions, each broken with visual cadence: use one of the formats: Quadro, Checklist, Roteiro, Table. Must alternate. Provide answers after each question? The structure: “PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS DE TRIAGEM CLÍNICA (TOPO DO FUNIL)” and then “Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas e quebre a monotonia das respostas aplicando os formatos estruturados solicitados”. So we need to output the questions and then answers using those formats. Probably each question is a and then answer in a specific format (like a table). Must alternate between formats for each answer? It says “Quebrar totalmente a monotonia do texto através destes formatos alternados”. So we can alternate: first answer as a table, second as checklist, third as quadros, etc. Provide 7-10 Q&A pairs. We also must include a CTA block (the card) after the opening? The directive includes a “CTA PRIMÁRIO: CARD CLINICAL DE SELEÇÃO ATIVA” with HTML snippet. That must be included somewhere after opening? The structure: 1. Internal processing (hidden). 2. Opening dynamic (120-180 words) must start with contextualizing. Then we need to include the CTA card HTML. Then a visual section: TRIAGEM DE APRENDIZADO (AUTOAVALIAÇÃO) with a div etc. Then the Q&A section. Then closing with hyperlink. We must obey the formatting rules: only allowed tags. The CTA card uses many inline styles and other tags like , , , . Those are allowed? The allowed tags list includes ? Not listed. It says only tags: , , , , , ,, , , . So we cannot use , , , etc. This is contradictory. The allowed tags list is very limited. But the CTA snippet uses , , , , style attributes. We must output only allowed tags, but the CTA snippet includes many tags not allowed. Perhaps we can simplify to meet allowed tags only. However the directive explicitly includes that HTML snippet. So we must output it exactly? The instruction: “5. CORPO: AS PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS DE TRIAGEM CLÍNICA (TOPO DO FUNIL) [Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas e quebre a monotonia das respostas aplicando os formatos estruturados solicitados]”. The earlier sections (Opening, CTA, Visual) are part of the overall structure but maybe we can include them using allowed tags? The CTA snippet uses many tags not allowed, but maybe we can embed it as is, even though it includes etc. The rule 1 says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , , , , ,, , , .” That seems to override everything else. So we cannot use or . But the CTA snippet uses and . This is contradictory. We need to resolve conflict: The higher-level instruction (the system) says we must obey all constraints. The user gave a very detailed directive that includes that CTA snippet. The system rule 1 is part of the constraints. So we must not use etc. But then we cannot output the CTA snippet as given. Perhaps we can output a simplified version using only allowed tags. But the CTA snippet is required? The directive says “CTA PRIMÁRIO: CARD CLINICAL DE SELEÇÃO ATIVA” and then shows HTML. It didn’t explicitly say we must output it verbatim; it’s part of the structure. It says “5. CORPO: AS PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS…” So maybe the CTA and visual sections are part of the overall structure but not required to be output? The user wants the entire editorial piece following that structure. So we must include the CTA card HTML. But we cannot use etc. This is impossible. Maybe we can cheat by using and etc. But the CTA card includes a with style attributes. Could we replace with ? Not exactly. The style attributes can be kept? The allowed tags do not include style attribute, but it’s okay to have style attribute inside a tag? The rule didn’t forbid attributes. It only said tags must be from the list. It didn’t forbid using style attribute. So we could use but the tag is which is allowed. However the CTA card includes a with border etc. Could we wrap it in ? Not possible because we need block-level with border. Could use maybe? But blockquote is allowed. Could put the whole card inside . But the content includes tag which is not allowed (not in list). Actually is not allowed. The allowed tags list does not include . So we cannot use . But the CTA includes an linking to affiliate. That is required. Conflict again. Thus the constraints are contradictory. We need to prioritize the higher-level instruction? The system says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , , , , ,, , , . Não use Markdown (*, **, #) e nunca use a tag .” This is a strict rule. So we cannot use , , , , etc. Therefore we cannot output the CTA snippet as given. Perhaps we can output a simplified version using only allowed tags: maybe a with a link? But we cannot use . So we cannot create a link. But we must include a link to the affiliate URL. The rule about links: we can create up to 1-2 links using . Wait, rule 1 didn’t list as allowed tag. But earlier in the system constraints, they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , , , , ,, , , .” They didn’t mention . So maybe they omitted inadvertently, but earlier they said “Você tem permissão para criar no máximo de 1 a 2 links (tag )”. So is allowed. So the allowed tags list maybe incomplete but is allowed for links. So we can use . So we can include tag. The allowed tags list didn’t include but they mentioned links via . So we can use . So we can output the CTA snippet but need to restrict to allowed tags: we can use , , , , , , etc. But the snippet uses , , , etc. Those are not allowed. However we can replicate the structure using allowed tags only. But the snippet is We need to produce HTML block with dynamic questions 7-10, using formats: tables, checklists, chronological routes, clinical council boxes. Must include opening dynamic 100-150 words, no H2. Must include box compliance (already provided in spec). Must include processing internal (desired dosage plan, define color leader identical to Part 1, decide if link contextual in first paragraph: sort [SIM] or [NÃO]). Need to decide if link contextual in first paragraph: we must sort [SIM] or [NÃO] (choose randomly). Provide link if yes. Must embed link in first paragraph if yes. Must include link contextual only if yes, but we can only have 1-2 links total in whole block. Already we have link at CTA. That’s one link. If we add another link in first paragraph, that would be second link. Must ensure total links <=2. We can choose [NÃO] to avoid extra link, but they said sort [SIM] or [NÃO] and insert link if yes. Could choose [SIM] and include link in first paragraph, but then we must ensure we don't exceed 2 links. The CTA link is already one. So if we include another link in first paragraph, that's 2 total, okay. Must use exact URL: https://go.hotmart.com/B77752154G?ap=2e5d. Must embed it discreetly. Use maybe. We also need to define “COR_LÍDER (idêntica à Parte 1)”. We don’t know what color was used in Part 1. Not provided. Could infer maybe a color used earlier? Not given. Might need to choose a color, but must be identical to Part 1. Since we don’t have that info, perhaps we can assume a color like “#2563EB” (a blue). But must be identical to Part 1; we don’t know. Could set it as a placeholder variable? The instruction: “Defina se haverá link contextual no primeiro parágrafo: Sorteie [SIM] ou [NÃO].” So we need to decide randomly. Let’s decide [SIM] and include link in first paragraph. Then we need to define COR_LÍDER identical to Part 1. Since we don’t know, maybe we can set it as “#1F2937” (dark gray) or something. But must be identical to Part 1; maybe Part 1 used a specific color. Not given. Could assume they used “#0f172a” (the dark background used in CTA). That appears in CTA. Might be the color leader. Let’s use “#0f172a”. That is dark navy. Use that as COR_LÍDER. We need to generate 7-10 dynamic questions as . Must vary response formats: tables, checklists, chronological routes, clinical council boxes. We must include the BOX CLINICAL DE COMPLIANCE DE BOLSO already defined in spec. It must be included exactly as provided? It says “BOX CLINICAL DE COMPLIANCE DE BOLSO” and includes HTML snippet. We must include that snippet exactly? Probably we need to embed that snippet in our output at appropriate place (maybe after opening). The spec says “BOX CLINICAL DE COMPLIANCE DE BOLSO” and provides HTML. We should include that HTML exactly as given. It includes a . We’ll include it. We must not use H1 or h1. Use ? Actually spec says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: , , , , , ,, , . Do not use markdown or h1.” So we can use for headings. The questions should be in according to spec? It says “Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas novas em formato “. But we cannot use h2? They said only allowed tags: , , , , , ,, , . h2 is not allowed. Conflict. But spec says use only those tags; maybe we can use for questions? But they explicitly say generate in format . However allowed tags list excludes h2. There’s a conflict. We need to prioritize the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” which says only those tags. So we cannot use . Perhaps we can use as heading, but they asked for . Might cause violation. But we must obey the stricter rule: only allowed tags. So we can use and still be okay? Might be considered not following requirement. However the instruction “Gere de 7 a 10 perguntas dinâmicas novas em formato ” is part of the content spec. But the later rule “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” says only use those tags. Which takes precedence? Probably the later rule is higher priority (explicit). So we cannot use . We could use and still be a heading. Might be acceptable. But we could also use for question text? Could use Pergunta 1: … . That might be okay. We need to produce 7-10 questions. Let’s produce 8 questions. We need to vary response formats: table, checklist, chronological route, clinical council box. We can embed a for one question, a checklist for another, a maybe not allowed? Not listed. Could use with . Chronological route could be a but not allowed. Could use with indicating steps. Clinical council box maybe we can embed a with style? Not allowed? Only allowed tags are listed; but we can embed a ? Not listed. However the BOX CLINICAL snippet uses with style; that is allowed? The spec only lists allowed tags, but the snippet includes . The spec earlier said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: , , , , , ,, , . Do not use markdown or h1.” It does not mention or is allowed. Actually is listed. is not listed. But the BOX snippet uses . That seems contradictory. However the spec includes that snippet as part of required output, so we must include it, thus is allowed in that context. So we can use for that box. Thus overall we can use for that box, but maybe not elsewhere. We need to include the BOX CLINICAL snippet exactly as given. We’ll place it after opening maybe. Now we need to produce the block: – First paragraph: opening dynamic 100-150 words, no H2. Must show that biggest error is lack of simple method, present product as structure, include link if we sorted [SIM]. We’ll decide [SIM] and include link. – Then BOX CLINICAL snippet (the compliance box). That is a block of HTML. – Then the questions (7-10) as maybe but they want . But we cannot use h2; maybe we can use but it’s okay. – Each question should be answered with varying formats. We must ensure total links <=2. We'll have one link in first paragraph (the affiliate link). Then the CTA link at the end is also a link; that would be second link. That's allowed (max 2). So we must include the CTA link as specified. That link uses [link_afiliado] placeholder; we must replace with the exact URL. Also the anchor text includes [COR_LÍDER] which is the color leader we defined "#0f172a". So the link's background color is set to [COR_LÍDER]; we need to set background color inline as that hex. Also the link text includes "➡️ Destravar Acesso e Iniciar Rotina Inteligente". That's fine. Thus we have two links: one in first paragraph (the affiliate link) and the CTA link at the end. That's exactly 2, within limit. Now we need to ensure we don't add any other links. Now we need to decide the color leader: we set "#0f172a". Use that as background color in CTA link: style="background:#0f172a;". Also the first paragraph link may also need to use that color? Not required. Now we need to include the link in first paragraph discreetly. We'll embed maybe but they said “insira o link `[link_afiliado]` discretamente.” So we can just put the URL as plain? But must be a link tag . We’ll embed it. Now we need to produce HTML with the required tags. Structure: First paragraph: maybe a with text and the link. Then BOX CLINICAL snippet (the provided HTML). That snippet includes its own etc. Then the questions section: maybe each question as followed by answer in various formats. We need 7-10 questions. Let’s produce 8. We need to vary formats: one as checklist (ul with li), one as table, one as chronological route (maybe ordered list using but not allowed; maybe use with steps). One as clinical council box (maybe a with style similar to compliance but different?). Could reuse the same style but maybe not needed. We need to ensure