We need to produce the first part of an analytical review for the product “{{TITULO_DO_LIVRO}}” by {{NOME_DO_AUTOR}}. The product is actually a tarot deck, not a book. But they refer to “{{TITULO_DO_LIVRO}}” and “{{NOME_DO_AUTOR}}”. Maybe they want to treat it as a book? However we follow instructions: generate first part of a review for the book “{{TITULO_DO_LIVRO}}” by {{NOME_DO_AUTOR}}. We must obey formatting: Use only HTML tags

,
,
, ,
,,
, ,
. No markdown. No H1. Use exactly 1 link of affiliate contextual in first or second paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado” (i.e., we need to embed a link with that class? They said use tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: inviting the reader to check availability). So we need to include a link with that tag? Probably just include Link_afiliado? Actually they said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando o leitor a conferir a disponibilidade ou recepção da obra).” So we need to include a link with the anchor text “Link_afiliado”? Or use that as placeholder? Probably we need to include a link that uses the URL provided: https://link.amazon/B05pipVpu. And we must use exactly 1 link total across whole text. So we must embed that link somewhere in the first or second paragraph. Also we must use the tag “Link_afiliado”? Not sure. They said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: inviting the reader to check availability)”. Maybe they want the anchor text to be “Link_afiliado”. So we should write Link_afiliado. That would be the link. We must also include exactly 1 CTA button in a card HTML after the contextualization. The card HTML is given; we must insert it immediately after the contextualization. It contains its own link to “Link_afiliado”. But we already used a link earlier; the card also contains a link with href=”Link_afiliado”. That would be a second link, violating the rule of exactly 1 link total. However the rule says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo”. The CTA card includes a link; but they said “no texto interno do card” there is no link, but the tag is inside the card. That would be a link as well. But they said “NÃO insira nenhum link de afiliado nesta seção (mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1)”. So the card’s link should not count as a link? The card includes an but they said no link in the text internal of the card. Perhaps they consider that not a link? But it’s a link. However they explicitly gave the HTML with href=”Link_afiliado”. That placeholder probably should be replaced with the actual URL. That would introduce a second link. But the rule says exactly 1 link total in the text of Part 1. So we must ensure only one link appears in the entire output. The card includes a link; we cannot have another. Perhaps we should not modify the href; maybe we leave it as “Link_afiliado” literal, which is not a real URL, but still an tag with href=”Link_afiliado”. That would be a link albeit placeholder. But they said we must use exactly 1 link contextual in first or second paragraph. The card’s link is not in that paragraph; it’s in the card. The rule about total links might refer to affiliate links in the whole text. They said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo”. So we must have exactly one link there. The card’s link might be considered separate; but they also said “NÃO insira nenhum link de afiliado nesta seção (mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1)”. So the card should not contain any affiliate link. So we must remove the href attribute? But we cannot modify the given HTML? The instructions say “Insira o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA e nenhum link no texto interno do card)”. So the card HTML contains an tag with href=”Link_afiliado”. That’s a link, but they say “nenhum link no texto interno do card”. Maybe they consider that the link is not part of the textual content but part of the CTA button; still it’s a link. But they say “nenhum link no texto interno do card”. The link is part of the button text; maybe they consider that not a link? Actually the button includes an tag; that is a link. But they said “nenhum link no texto interno do card”. Could interpret that the card’s internal text should not contain any link besides the button? The button is a link; but they might consider that okay because it’s the CTA. However they also said total links must be exactly 1. So we must have exactly one link in the whole Part 1. That link should be placed in the first or second paragraph. The CTA button also includes a link; that would be a second link, violating the rule. To satisfy both, perhaps we can keep the CTA button’s href as “Link_afiliado” but that still counts as a link. But maybe they consider the CTA button’s link not counted because it’s not “contextual”? The rule about exactly 1 link contextual is separate; the CTA button is not contextual? It is also a link but maybe they allow it because it’s part of the CTA and not counted as “link contextual”? The instruction “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag “Link_afiliado”” suggests we must put exactly one link there, and the CTA button also contains a link but maybe they don’t count it as “contextual”? However they also said “mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1″. That suggests the entire Part 1 must have exactly 1 affiliate link. So we must ensure that the CTA button does not contain an actual link; maybe we can leave href=”#”? But that would break the given HTML. However we can replace the href with something that doesn’t count as a link? It still is a link. But perhaps they consider the CTA button’s link as not part of the “text” but as part of the button; still it’s a link. I think we need to keep exactly one link overall; we can place the link in the first paragraph, and then in the CTA button we must not include any link; but the provided HTML includes a link. Maybe we can remove the tag? But we must insert the block as given; we cannot modify it? The instruction says “Insira o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA e nenhum link no texto interno do card)”. So the block contains a link? Actually they say “nenhum link no texto interno do card”. The link is not “texto interno”, it’s an attribute. The tag is part of the HTML; maybe they consider that as a link, but they said no link in the text internal, meaning the visible text inside the card should not contain a link; but the tag is not visible text? It is part of the markup. I think we can keep the tag but it’s still a link. To satisfy the exactly 1 link rule, we must ensure that the only link in the entire output is the one we place in the first or second paragraph. Therefore we must remove the tag from the CTA block or set href to something that doesn’t actually link? But it’s still a link. Maybe we can set href=”” (empty) which still is a link but not pointing anywhere; but still a link. The rule counts any tag? Probably yes. So to have exactly 1 link, we must have only one tag in the entire output. The CTA block includes an tag; we cannot have another. So we must not add any additional tag in the paragraph. The CTA block already has an . That would be the only link, but then we must not have any other link elsewhere. However the instruction says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag “Link_afiliado””. That suggests we need to put a link there, but the CTA block already has a link; maybe they want that link to be the same as the contextual link? The CTA block’s uses the placeholder “Link_afiliado”. We can replace that placeholder with the actual URL, but that would be the same link as the contextual one? Actually we need exactly one link total; we can use the same link in both places? That would be two occurrences of the same link? That might count as two links? Probably they count occurrences, not unique URLs. So we must have exactly one tag in the entire output. The CTA block already contains an tag; we cannot add another. So we must not add any additional tag elsewhere. The instruction about inserting a link contextual may be contradictory; but maybe they want the link to be inside the CTA block? But they said “no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo”. The CTA block is after the contextualization; not part of those paragraphs. So we need to embed the link in the We need to produce the second part of an analytical review for the product “Wyspell Cartas de tarô – Tarô Starlight com livro guia…”. Actually they call it “livro”? It’s a tarot deck with guide book. They want a second part of a review, following strict formatting rules. We must produce in HTML using only
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, . No markdown or h1. Must be extremely scannable, micro paragraphs max 3 lines each. Include bullet points at least every 2 paragraphs. Must have exactly 1 affiliate link contextual in the last paragraph of the “PERFIL DO LEITOR, CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO E CONCLUSÃO EDITORIAL” section, using tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: inviting reader to check reviews or offers). Also need to include exactly 1 CTA button in the final editorial card HTML, with the provided structure, using href=”Link_afiliado”. Must not include any other links in the card text. Must not invent URLs; must use the given link: https://link.amazon/B05pipVpu. We need to produce the block of continuation based strictly on the directive. They said “Escreva o bloco de continuidade baseado estritamente na diretriz acima. Entre direto na resposta das perguntas, sem introduções.” So we need to output the second part of the review: that includes the “PERFIL DO LEITOR, CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO E CONCLUSÃO EDITORIAL” (300-650 words) with constraints, and then the “CARD DE VEREDITO EDITORIAL FINAL COM BOTÃO CTA” HTML block. We must not have introductory text. Directly produce the content. We must use HTML tags only:
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, . No other tags like
maybe allowed? They said only those tags. But the card HTML they gave uses
,
,
, , etc. However they said “Write EXCLUSIVELY in clean HTML using:
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, . Do not use markdown or h1.” So we cannot use
,
, etc? But they gave a card HTML example that uses those tags. There’s a conflict. The instruction says “Write EXCLUSIVELY in HTML clean using:
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, . Do not use markdown or h1.” That suggests we should only use those tags. But the card block they provided uses
,
, . Perhaps they want us to output exactly that block as given, but they said we must use only those tags. However they also gave the block as part of the directive, maybe they want us to output that exact block, which includes
etc. The instruction says “Escreva o bloco de continuidade baseado estritamente na diretriz acima.” The directive includes the card HTML block. So we should output that block exactly as given, but we must adhere to the rule of only using allowed tags. However the block includes
,
, , etc. Maybe they consider those allowed because they are part of the block they gave. The rule “Write EXCLUSIVELY in HTML clean using:
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, ” maybe is for the entire answer, but the card block is provided as a snippet that we must include exactly. That snippet uses
,
, , but maybe they consider those okay because it’s part of the required output. The instruction is contradictory. Usually they want us to output the card HTML exactly as given, which includes
. So we should output that block exactly, including the
wrapper and the tag with href=”Link_afiliado”. They said “Insira o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA e nenhum link no texto interno do card)”. So we must include that block exactly, with href=”Link_afiliado”. They also said “using tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: convidando o leitor a verificar avaliações ou conferir ofertas)”. So we need to replace Link_afiliado with the actual URL? They said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: … )”. Probably we need to put the actual URL there. So the href attribute should be “https://link.amazon/B05pipVpu”. They said “insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no texto e 1 botão CTA no card HTML.” So we need to have exactly 1 link in the entire text, which is the CTA button’s href. So we must not have any other tags elsewhere. Thus we need to produce the second part: first the “PERFIL DO LEITOR, CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO E CONCLUSÃO EDITORIAL” section (300-650 words) with constraints: max 3 lines per paragraph, bullet points every 2 paragraphs, include FAQ with bold highlights, no rehashing basic plot, no chapter list, include exactly 1 affiliate link in the last paragraph of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. Then after that, we need to output the CARD HTML block. We must ensure the entire answer uses only allowed tags. But the card block uses
,
,
, . Maybe they consider those allowed because they are part of the required block. The instruction “Write EXCLUSIVELY in HTML clean using:
,
,
,
, ,
,,
, ” might be a generic instruction for the whole answer, but they explicitly gave a block that uses other tags. I think we should output the block exactly as given, including
,
, etc. The rest of the answer should also follow that style: use
,
,
,
, etc. So we can use
for headings,
for paragraphs,
for bullet lists. Use for bold. We need to produce the content in Portuguese. Must be analytical review of the product “Wyspell Cartas de tarô – Tarô Starlight com livro guia, baralho de tarô exclusivo para iniciantes, cartas modernas de adivinhação (ouro)”. They want a second part of a review, focusing on reader profile, cost-benefit, editorial conclusion. We need to keep each paragraph max 3 lines (i.e., short). Use bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So we need to alternate paragraphs and bullet lists. We need to include a FAQ format with bold highlights. Could be bullet list with questions? Use for highlights. We need to include exactly 1 affiliate link in the last paragraph of this section, using the tag “Link_afiliado”. That likely means we need to include an link text. So we need to embed the URL there. We must not exceed 650 words, but we can aim around 400-500 words. We must ensure bullet points appear at least every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph 1, we can have a bullet list; after paragraph 3, another bullet list, etc. We must not repeat information already covered at the beginning of the text. The beginning presumably was earlier part of the article, but we don’t have that. We just need to continue. We must not have generic intro or greeting. Enter directly into useful information. We must not use markdown or h1. Use
maybe for subheadings. We must not use any other tags besides allowed ones. But we need to embed the card HTML which uses
etc. That might be okay. Let’s craft: First, maybe a heading
Perfil do Leitor, Custo‑Benefício e Conclusão Editorial
Then paragraphs. We need bullet lists every 2 paragraphs. So structure: Paragraph 1 (max 3 lines). Then bullet list (ul>li items). Then paragraph 2 (max 3 lines). Then bullet list again. Continue. We need to include FAQ with bold highlights. Could be bullet list with questions in bold. We need to end the section with a paragraph that contains the affiliate link. That paragraph must be the last paragraph of this section, and must contain exactly 1 link using the tag “Link_afiliado”. So we can write something like: “Para saber mais avaliações e conferir ofertas, visite Link_afiliado.” But we must use the tag “Link_afiliado” exactly? They said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: inviting the reader to check reviews or check offers)”. So maybe we need to wrap the link text with that tag? Actually they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: … )”. Might mean we need to use the placeholder “Link_afiliado” as the href value? In the card block they used href=”Link_afiliado”. So maybe we need to replace that placeholder with the actual URL. So in the paragraph we should include a link with href=”https://link.amazon/B05pipVpu”. And we can label the link text as “Link_afiliado”? Or we can just include the URL as the href, and the anchor text can be something like “verificar avaliações”. But they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. Might be they want the anchor text to be “Link_
Relacionado

, etc. The rest of the answer should also follow that style: use

for headings,

Perfil do Leitor, Custo‑Benefício e Conclusão Editorial

Relacionado

Wyspell Tarô Starlight – Guia Completo | Review

,

,

Governador Haylock – Thamy Bastida | Dossiê Completo

HONRA QUEBRADA – Segredo do Mafioso (Kindle) | Resenha

Os mistérios do Universo – Explore o cosmos agora

Meu Caso Perdido – Izzy Psendziuk | Veredito Final

Marido Cruel: Príncipes do Deserto – Mário Lucas | Dossiê

A Empregada — Freida McFadden, thriller imperdível e final surpreendente|ebook

Deixe um comentário Cancelar resposta

Relaciodos e Indicações

Aprendizado e Educação

Ferramentas e Negócios